Brave Firefox

The notable exceptions are Firefox and Apple’s Safari. The Brave browser uses Blink, so it isn’t special in that regard. What makes it special is its emphasis on making privacy and safety front.

Brave Firefox Reddit
Brave Firefox Or Chrome
Brave Firefox
Brave Firefox Extension

Brave has gotten more attention than most alternate browsers, partly because a co-founder was one of those who kick-started Mozilla's Firefox, partly because of its very unusual — some say. Mozilla Firefox on PC have custom proxy settings Brave offers ability to block ads, fingerprints, and cookies without having to install 3rd party extensions.and offers BAT reward program. Microsoft Edge completely revamped their efforts by completely re-engineering their browser off Chromium browser. Google Chrome on Windows and Android. Brave is ranked 6th while Mozilla Firefox is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Brave is: Takes privacy seriously by blocking ads and trackers and not tracking people's searches. Things like HTTPS everywhere and no tracking are standard with Brave. Brave is available as a fast, free, secure web browser for your mobile devices. Complete with a built-in ad blocker that prevents tracking and provides security protection with optimized data and battery performance.

Users looking for a privacy-focused browser might want to consider Brave first, according to a study published this week.

Douglas Leith, professor of computer systems at Trinity University, examined six browsers for his report – Web Browser Privacy: What Do Browsers Say When They Phone Home? He found that Brave’s Chromium-based browser is the least likely to reveal unique identifying information about the computer using it.

The study examined six browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Brave, Edge, and Yandex. It used several tests to deduce whether the browser can track the user’s IP address over time, and whether it leaks details of web page visits. To do this, it looked at the data shared on startup after a fresh install, on a restart, and after both pasting and typing a URL into the address bar. It also explored what the browser did when it was idle.

Even though Mozilla makes a talking point of privacy in Firefox, it was Brave, developed by Mozilla’s founder (and creator of JavaScript) Brendan Eich, that won out. Brave, which has accused Google of privacy violations, is “by far the most private of the browsers studied” when used with its out of the box settings, according to the paper.

The study placed browsers in one of three privacy classes, based on the time span over which they retain identifiers. Brave gets the top class all to itself because it uses what the study calls ‘ephemeral’ identifiers that link a handful of transmissions and then reset. This means it doesn’t remember your identifier across browser restarts.

The paper lumps Safari, Firefox, and Chrome together in the second band. These browsers share some privacy issues, the paper warns, including auto-tagging each browser instance with unique session and browser instance identifiers that can persist across restarts. These behaviours can be disabled but they’re turned on silently by default, the paper claims.

The research picks out four identifiers that Firefox uses. Two created by the browser persist across browser restarts, while the third changes between browser sessions but could be linked together because old and new values are sent together in a telemetry message, the paper said. The fourth identifier, created by the server, is associated with an open web socket used for Firefox’s push services. Firefox also sends user IP addresses with these identifiers.

Leith’s paper acknowledges that Mozilla deletes the IP addresses sent with these identifiers after 30 days, but frets that the company is “silent on the uses to which the IP data is put.” He worries that this could be used to track the user’s location, adding:

That does not mean such linking actually takes place, only that the potential exists for it to be done.

Leith had asked Mozilla whether it used IP addresses for location tracking, and also asked for the company’s IP address usage policy as part of its push service. He received no response. Mozilla spokesperson Justin O’Kelly didn’t address those issues specifically with us, but responded:

Firefox does collect some technical data about how users interact with our product, but that does not include the user’s browsing history. This data is transmitted along with a unique randomly generated identifier. IP addresses are retained for a short period for security and fraud detection and then deleted. They are stripped from telemetry data and are not used to correlate user activity across browsing sessions.

Leith’s paper also calls out Safari, which it said allows all the third-party sites listed on its start page to set cookies without user consent. It also phones home to icloud.com even from machines that aren’t registered with that Apple service, the paper warns, calling this connection “spurious”.

Apple was also the most aggressive browser when it came to sending data that users typed into the address bar back to Apple servers for autocomplete purposes, the paper warned:

The requests to Apple include identifiers that persist across browser restarts and so can be used to link requests together and so reconstruct browsing history.

Apple didn’t respond to our request for comment.

Google’s Chrome phones home almost every letter typed into the search bar for autocomplete purposes, the paper said. Even after unticking the ‘allow telemetry’ box, the browser sets up a cookie with Google’s server that it then communicates each time the browser is opened, Leith found, and this happens even if the user isn’t logged into Google. Google declined to comment for our article but pointed us to its Chrome Privacy White Paper.

The issue for many of these browsers seems to be not so much what they’re doing, as the fact that they do it by default, leaving non-techie or unaware users open to more information gathering. From Leith’s paper:

In summary, Chrome, Firefox and Safari can all be configured to be much more private but this requires user knowledge (since intrusive settings are silently enabled) and active intervention to adjust settings.

The paper reserves the gravest concerns for the third, least private group that it identified, containing Edge and Yandex. These use identifiers linked to the device hardware, it said, persisting across fresh browser installs. They can also be used to link different apps running on the same device.

Edge also contacts a Microsoft advertising server, the paper said, which sends back several identifiers that Edge then echoes in subsequent requests to that server. It added:

Loading of the Edge welcome page sets a number of cookies. In particular, this includes a cookie for vortex.data.microsoft.com, which appears to be a data logging server, and allows data transmitted to this server to be linked to the same browser instance.

Even pasting (rather than typing) a URL into the address bar contains what the paper calls “unwanted consequences”, including leaking user browsing history to Bing via the search engine’s autocomplete API, and once again contacting vortext.data.microsoft.com.

Microsoft’s Edge privacy page says that it sends device identifiers as part of a diagnostics reporting service that users can turn off. Users can also delete this data on the server. According to its Edge privacy white paper, people can turn off Search Suggestions to stop it sending your search terms to Bing, which otherwise keeps them for six months.

Yandex didn’t respond to the paper’s allegations that its browser, popular among Russian speakers, sends user browsing data to Yandex servers as part of its autocomplete API, along with the text of web pages to its translation service. It also sends the SHA-1 hashed MAC address of a machine to Yandex, along with browser identifiers, enabling them to be tied together, Leith’s paper said.

Latest Naked Security podcast

LISTEN NOW

Click-and-drag on the soundwaves below to skip to any point in the podcast.

While standalone virtual private networks will almost always offer you the strongest privacy protections, a growing suite of browser-based VPNs are worth checking into for those of us looking for something more lightweight that still ups your online security . Easier to use than standalone VPNs, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Brave Browser now all offer browser-based options designed to keep you scrolling fast while hiding your IP.

VPN helps employees work remotely and help individuals avoid censorship.

Here's what you need to know about these browser-based VPNs, and what they offer.

Read more:The best VPN services of 2021

Browser-based VPNs vs. standalone VPNs

Brave Firefox Reddit

There are three different types of VPNs you can opt for, and each offers a different layer of protection.

First, there are router VPNs, which funnel all of the internet activity of everything connected to your home Wi-Fi network into their servers to keep you anonymous. Secondly, there are VPN apps for your computer or mobile that will protect your anonymity only on the device you've put them on, such as ExpressVPN or NordVPN.

And finally, there are browser-based proxy services and VPNs. Sometimes browser companies erroneously call their proxy services a VPN to make them sound more secure, but I've noted which are which below. Where desktop and mobile VPNs protect the anonymity of your whole device -- all internet activity in your browsers, file-sharing apps and email clients -- browser-based proxies just anonymize what happens in your browser. They're less secure and less private, but far faster.

Whether you opt for a browser-based VPN or not, we still recommend tweaking your browser's settings to take advantage of any current privacy options you've already got onboard.

Brave

Rather than being just a simple proxy service, Brave's built-in browser VPN for iPhone and iPad delivers a full encryption experience. Strong security often comes at the expense of speed, but not so when paired with Brave Browser's lightning speeds.

The browser feature, called Brave Firewall + VPN, is actually a combination of its VPN and its Brave Firewall protection software which blocks malicious websites and trackers more thoroughly than most of its competitors. And unlike most other browser-based VPNs, Brave Firewall + VPN offers full device encryption. It runs $10 per month or $100 per year, and a single subscription can be used on up to five devices.

Firefox

Mozilla's VPN experience has been a bit confusing. First, its standalone VPN was known as Firefox Private Network, and then Firefox VPN. Then Mozilla launched an add-on, changed the standalone's name to Mozilla VPN, and called the add-on Firefox Private Network. Phew.

But never mind the early confusion. The Firefox Private Network add-on is a proxy service that's worth checking out if you want a light layer of privacy while browsing on public Wi-Fi. It doesn't offer full-device encryption the way the standalone Mozilla VPN does, but it doesn't drag your speeds down as much either. It's also easy to use: it's single, on-off switch makes it a breeze to operate.

Brave Firefox Or Chrome

And, yes, it's completely free of charge. While we usually would never recommend using a free VPN, again, this isn't really a VPN: It's a proxy service that offers extra privacy, not the full VPN suite of tools. If you want to really cover your tracks by upgrading to a full VPN, you should always use a paid service with a proven privacy track record (check out our favorite VPNs here).

Chrome

Chrome doesn't have a native VPN built into it. Instead, you'll need to use browser-based extensions from your preferred VPN to get the same effect.

Brave Firefox

I recommend using the Chrome extension from our Editors' Choice VPN service, ExpressVPN. You can also use it on Firefox, Edge, Brave and Vivaldi browsers. You'll still need to have downloaded the full ExpressVPN app, but the lightweight browser extension allows you to streamline your VPN use to just geolocation changes and a couple other core privacy features.

In October of 2020, Google launched its own standalone VPN as part of its $100 annual bundle package for Google One subscribers with a 2TB account. If you're already a Google One user and simply looking for an extra layer of protection while using free public Wi-Fi, this VPN could be a great fit.

If you're interested in keeping your browsing and usage data private from corporations and government entities, however, I'd urge you to consider carefully Google's long, storied history of sharing and collecting user data before you use any of its products.

Brave Firefox Extension

For more on VPNs, check out our picks for the best cheap VPNs, the fastest VPNs we've tested, and how to choose the right VPN provider for working from home.